Analogical Reasoning in Decision Processes
نویسنده
چکیده
We give a de nition of reasoning by analogy, which is tailored to a setting of decision making under uncertainty. We present a model of decision making which is based on such a de nition, and show that it is compatible with a large class of preferences. 1 Reasoning by Analogy Analogy is the recognition that one thing A (a phenomenon, a problem, etc.) is like another thing B and that, therefore, consequences (inferences, explanations, solutions, etc.) that can be drawn from A can be drawn from B as well. Analogy is a reasoning process that is so pervasive in human life that can be viewed as one of the cornerstones of human thought. In the Dictionary of Philosophy of Mind [7], Analogy is recognized as, ... an important kind of thinking contributing to such cognitive tasks as explanation, planning and decision making (Paul Thagard). Because of this, it is not surprising that the concept of Analogy has been an object of philosophical reection since ancient times.1 As of today, research on the concept of Analogy and on the process of analogical reasoning has become increasingly important in the study of Arti cial Intelligence (see, for instance, [10]). Again, this is not surprising given the nature of the subject. What is surprising is that classical theories of decision making under uncertainty do not explicitly recognize the role played by analogical reasoning. Theories of decision making under uncertainty are concerned with explaining/guiding the behavior of individuals who have to choose a course of action I bene ted from comments and suggestions from Paolo Ghirardato, Tzachi Gilboa, Ket Richter, Aldo Rustichini, Paolo Siconol , Max Stinchcombe and Stan Wellisz. I also wish to thank seminar participants at RUD 2003, CalTech, University of Minnesota, University of Texas-Austin, Columbia University, University of Rochester, Rutgers University, University of Turin, Ohio State University. yDepartment of Economics, Columbia University, 1019 IAB, 420 W 118th street, NY, NY 10027. Email: [email protected]. 1To give just one example, reections on the concept recur several times in St. Thomas from the Summa Theologica to the De potentia to the De veritates.
منابع مشابه
NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY A Cognitive Model of Recognition-Based Moral Decision Making A DISSERTATION SUBMITTED TO THE GRADUATE SCHOOL IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS for the degree DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY Field of Computer Science By
A Cognitive Model of Recognition-Based Moral Decision Making Morteza Dehghani The study of decision making has been dominated by economic perspectives, which model people as rational agents who carefully weigh costs and benefits and try to maximize the utility of every choice, without consideration of issues such as cultural norms, religious beliefs and moral rules. However, psychological findi...
متن کاملAnalogical reasoning and case-based learning in model management systems
Developing computer-based model management systems has been a focus of recent research in decision support. In this paper, we explore the use of analogical reasoning and case-based learning in model management. Analogical reasoning and case-based learning are techniques found useful in human problem solving. They can help model builders apply their modeling experience to construct new models an...
متن کاملTRAINING AN IMPLICIT REASONING STRATEGY: ENGAGING SPECIFIC REASONING PROCESSES TO ENHANCE KNOWLEDGE ACQUISITION by CHRISTOPHER L. VOWELS
A training protocol was developed to teach an implicit reasoning strategy to encourage the consideration of alternatives, specifically in behavioral trap decision environments. Engaging the strategy would thereby decrease the effect of focusing on traps, resulting in more rational behavior. In two studies, training was delivered in an instructor-less environment using paper-pencil and multimedi...
متن کاملPerforming Strategy: Analogical Reasoning as a Strategic Practice
Imagination Lab Foundation researchers communicate their findings to interested readers through the Working Paper publication series. This paper should be considered preliminary in nature and subject to subsequent revision. ABSTRACT Analogical reasoning refers to the successful transfer of structural similarities from a source to a target domain. In strategic management research, this concept h...
متن کاملAnalogical Reasoning as Translation : the Pragmatics of Transivity ? ?
This paper attempts to examine the underlying structure of analogical reasoning in decision making. The immediate (but not exclusive) context is the form of reasoning commonly seen as prevalent in common-law judicial decision making. Following Wittgenstein and Strawson the paper identifies the problem of the contingency of transitivity of analogical relations as a serious impediment to analogic...
متن کاملAnalogical Reasoning as Translation: The Pragmatics of Transitivity
This paper attempts to examine the underlying structure of analogical reasoning in decision making. The immediate (but not exclusive) context is the form of reasoning commonly seen as prevalent in common-law judicial decision making. Following Wittgenstein and Strawson the paper identifies the problem of the contingency of transitivity of analogical relations as a serious impediment to analogic...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
عنوان ژورنال:
دوره شماره
صفحات -
تاریخ انتشار 2006